Wednesday, October 12, 2011

President Bush

To:      Laura Ingraham

From:  Jack West
               Fairfield, NJ

Dear Laura,

Is it any wonder that more people are blaming Bush than Obama for this sad economy when not even conservative talk show hosts can ever find anything creditable to say about President Bush?  Does everyone forget about the 54 months of economic growth and the Dow Jones Average steadily climbing toward the 14000 mark after the Bush tax cuts took effect?  For the biggest part of the time President Bush was in office the unemployment rate was five percent and lower.  And doesn’t anyone ever give any thought to the effect the assault by the OPEC countries had on our economy when they gradually brought the price of their oil to the peak of $147 a barrel in 2008?  This was the thing that had the most direct effect on bringing about the downturn and no one ever says anything about it.  The cost of energy for every household and industry and most directly transportation costs wrecked everyone’s budget.

 Obama has been allowed to get away with making the false claim over and over again that he inherited a down economy.  He came into his “inheritance” two years before he took office as a result of the 2006 elections when the Democrats gained vetoproof control of the purse strings.  The economy was humming along well at that time in spite of the Middle East War.  The Internet indicates the unemployment rate to have been at 4.6% at that time and in 2008 it was 5.8%.

And who do we have to thank for not letting us be energy independent as we could be?  We have as much natural gas in this country as Saudi Arabia has oil.  We have enough oil not only in Alaska and offshore but in many parts of the “lower 48” – enough for our own needs as well as being competitors on the world market.  The revenue that would generate would give us all the capital we would need for research and development of renewable sources of energy.  We don’t have to live like paupers while we wait to be served by green energy.

 I’d like to see an end to this constant talk about Bush being as bad as Obama.  On the contrary, those who know how much the country is indebted to him know that that is a false claim.  It’s not going to help to unseat our Apologizer-in-Chief in 2012 by being fearful of saying anything complimentary about President Bush.  

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Oil and the Department of Energy

This is one of several dozen statements in an e-letter entitled Walmart and the Morons that was forwarded to me: 

g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before.

We use oil whether radical environmentalists like it or not and we don't have to rely on foreign hostile countries for our needs.  We not only have enough for ourselves right here but enough to make us competitive on the world market.   The current price for gasoline in Saudi Arabia, according to the Internet,  is 22 cents a gallon.  In Kuwait it's 16 cernts.  The prosperity we would enjoy by using our own energy supplies of oil and natural gas would provide all the capital needed for research and development of renewable sources of energy. 

                              

Monday, September 12, 2011

Who is Rick Perry?


Who Is Rick Perry?

He is a fifth generation Texan, the son of hardscrabble west Texas tenant farmers – Democrats but conservatives through and through. He grew up in a farm town too small to be on the state map. Life was so hard that he was six years old before his house had indoor plumbing. His mother sewed his clothes, including the underwear he wore to college.

He is an Eagle Scout. After Paint Creek High School , he attended Texas A&M, graduated, and was commissioned into the Air Force where he became a C-130 pilot.

Now 61 years old, he has won nine elections to four different offices in Texas state government. In the first three elections he ran as a Democrat then switched to the Republican Party. He is currently the 47th governor of Texas – a position he has held for 11 years, the longest tenure of any governor in the nation.

He has never lost an election.

Rick Perry was the Lieutenant Governor to whom Governor George Bush handed over the office after winning the 2000 Presidential election. Since then, Perry won gubernatorial elections in 2002, 2004, and 2010, the last time by 55% against a field consisting of a Democrat, a Libertarian, a Green Party, and an Independent.

Since he became its Governor, Texas – a right to work state that taxes neither personal income nor capital gains – has added more jobs than the other 49 states combined. In the last two years, low taxes and little regulation led his state to create 47% of all jobs created in the entire nation. Five of the top ten cities with the highest job growth in the nation are in Texas . People follow jobs, so in the last four years for which data are available, Texas led every state in net interstate migration growth.

Perry signed ground-breaking “loser pays” tort reform and medical litigation rules that caused malpractice insurance rates to fall. Some 20,000 doctors have since moved to Texas .

Texas boasts 58 of the Fortune 500 companies – more than any other state. Since May 2011 Texas resumed its pre-recession employment levels. Only two other states and the District of Columbia have done that.

Texas ships 16% of the nation’s export value. California trails at 11%. Of the 70 companies that have fled California so far in 2011, 14 relocated in Texas .

In this year’s Texas legislative season, Perry got most of what he wanted. With no new taxes, a fiscally lean state budget was passed leaving $6 billion in a rainy day fund even as other states around the country struggled to balance budgets and avoid more deficit borrowing. A voter ID bill passed that was designed to prevent ballot box fraud and illegal voting. A bill passed that makes plaintiffs pay court costs and attorney fees if their suits are deemed frivolous.

Perry scored points even in his legislative failures. He failed to get sanctuary cities banned – Texas towns in which police cannot question detainees about their immigration status. The blame fell on the legislature. Perry also failed to get a so-called “anti-groping” bill passed that would put Transportation Security Administration agents in prison if they touch the genitals, anus, or breasts of passengers in a pat down. Federal officials threatened to halt all flights out of Texas airports and the bill died in special session. That endeared Texans even more to TSA employees living in Texas .

Perry jogs daily in the morning. He has no bodyguard with him, but his daughter’s dog runs by his side and he carries a laser-guided automatic pistol in his belt. Last year while jogging in an undeveloped area, a coyote paralleled his jogging route, eyeing his dog. He drew his pistol and killed the animal with one shot, leaving it where it fell. “He became mulch," Perry said. Animal rights groups protested, but Perry shrugged it off. “Don’t come after my dog,” he warned them.

Recently, Obama asked Perry to delay the July 7 execution of Humberto Leal in order to comply with the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Perry refused. Therefore Obama asked the US Supreme Court to delay the execution because it would damage US foreign relations. The Court refused 5-4 and Perry ordered the execution to go forward as scheduled. Over the howls of diplomats, politicians, and the UN, Leal was administered a lethal injection at 6:20 p.m. Before he died, he admitted his guilt and asked for forgiveness.

The case has special implications for Perry, who is considering a run for the presidency in 2012. Even his critics resent federal interference in a Texas execution, which is related to a state, not a federal, crime – an alcohol and drug-fueled rape and murder 17 years ago by an illegal whose family brought him into the country 35 years ago as a child. The interference hinges not on the man’s guilt, which Leal’s advocates acknowledged, but on a technicality – failure to inform Leal that he could have gotten legal representation from the Mexican consulate in lieu of the court-appointed attorneys who represented him. Independent Texans saw Obama’s interference as another intrusion of federal power into the affairs of a state, which could cost Obama support in other states.

Needless to say, Perry is a hard-edged conservative and a ferocious defender of 10th Amendments rights (“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”) – an explicit restriction of the federal government to only those powers granted in the Constitution. Perry accuses the federal government, especially the Obama administration, of illegal overreach.

Perry said “no thanks” to the feds whose stimulus offered taxpayer dollars for education and unemployment assistance. The strings on “free money” from Washington , he said, would restrict Texas in managing its own affairs. Perry even depleted all state funds to fight recent wildfires before asking Washington for disaster relief. His request has been ignored, which comes across as an unvarnished federal power play, further pitting Perry and Texans against the federal government.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Democrat's false charges

This is a letter I'm sending to Fox News reporters and others:


To:       Laura Ingraham

 From:  Jack West

             Fairfield, NJ


Dear Laura,

Whenever you’re interviewing a Democrat guest you know that somewhere in the course of his/her comments you’ll hear the false charge that President Obama “inherited” a down economy.  Please don’t let them get away with that.  What the Democrats got in January 2009 they brought with them.  As the result of the 2006 elections the Democrats took over unencumbered, vetoproof control of the purse strings when they were seated in January 2007.  This was with the help of a RINO Senator from Vermont.  The unemployment rate at that time was 4.6% and the economy was humming. In December 2007, eleven months after the Democrat Congress was seated the recession began according to the Internet.  In January 2009 the unemployment rate hit 7.6%.  Please let your Democrat guests know that when they make their false charges.

In regard to the housing debacle, there are videos on You-Tube showing Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Chuck Schumer and others telling us that “There is no housing crisis” when President Bush was exhorting Congress to rein in Fannie May and Freddie Mac.  His first warnings came during the first year he was in office.

But the real crusher to our economy came with the economic war the OPEC countries waged on us in 2008.  We have none but the Democrats to thank for that.  Because of the strong pressures they put on us not to develop our own vast resources and depend on OPEC for our oil needs, we were left wide open to OPEC’s assault.  We have enough oil in the “lower 48,” Alaska and offshore to not only make us self-sufficient but to make us competitors on the world market.  We would not have a national debt if we went after the treasures we have in the ground right here and we’d have a bountiful amount of money to put toward developing renewable sources of energy.                       

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

This is a letter I sent to Senator Dick Durbin:


Dear Senator Durbin,

You mentioned on Face the Nation on Sunday, 7/17/11, that the national debt rose somewhat substantially under President Reagan.  In order for that comment to gain traction it would be necessary for people who lived through the Reagan Administration years to forget about the very noble mission he was on.  And for the younger people it would have to depend on them not doing their homework to enlighten them what Reagan had done.  The SDI program was a costly one but it did result in bringing about a victorious end to the cold war (or did at least reduce the Soviets to a whimper).  According to Wikipedia the public debt truly did raise from $712B to $2T in the Reagan years and a year after he left office we saw the Berlin Wall come tumbling down.  It would be hard to believe that any loyal American wasn’t happy to see that happen.

Today’s spending mania makes Reagan’s pale by comparison.  There IS justification for being involved in two of the three wars we’re engaged in.  But there are things we hear about here and there that make us wonder - such as research being done with shrimp on walking machines and subsidies being given to companies such as GE who made 14B in profits in 2010 and paid no taxes.  There are other examples.

Under President Bush the gross public debt rose from 5.7T in January 2001 to 10.7T by 12/2008.  Under President Obama the debt increased from 10.7T to 14.2T by 2/2011 – an increase of 3.5 trillion in 25 months.  The war in Iraq HAS been a justifiable cause and to rid the terrorists from a safe haven in Afghanistan is important.  I can’t believe that any of us aren’t happy to see the end of the monster Saddam Hussein and his serial rapist sons.  Not even a beautiful young bride walking with her husband was safe from falling prey to them.  The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan also had the effect of having the cowardly lion in Libya scrapping his nuclear weapons program, fearful of being the next one the coalition would be going after. 

But the sad thing about this whole spending debate is that it should be taking place at all.  With the wealth of resources God has graced this great land with we should be the richest, debt free nation on the planet if we would get to work seriously developing these treasures instead of being beholden to foreign nations, some of whom are not even friendly to us.  Would we be in the mess we’re in now if we had not fallen prey to the economic attack the oil producing nations waged on us in 2008 that we put our reliance on?  Does it make sense that we should be giving two billion dollars to Brazil to drill a 10,000 foot deep well in the Gulf of Mexico while President Obama’s agents refuse to issue permits to our own oil companies who would be putting our own people to work?  Are we to believe that they can mine that oil in a more environmentally safe way than we can?  What about the revenue that would be coming into the treasury from the wage earners and the businesspeople who would be paying taxes on these earnings?      

Sincerely,

Jack West





  

       

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Kudos to Tom Donahue

This is a copy of a letter I sent to Neil Cavuto:

Dear Neil,

Kudos to Tom Donohue, the President and CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, who was being interviewed on your time segment of Fox News at 4:30 PM Monday 7/12. I am in full agreement and have been touting for a long time what he was saying. We would have the richest, debt free nation on the planet if we would make use of the vast resources of this land of milk and honey that God has graced us with. And we have the people with the skills that can tap that wealth in an environmentally friendly way. Hopefully we’ll someday get the people we need to wrest this nation from the grip of the fools who are preventing us from using these resources.

Donohue also made good sense of the way to raise revenue. He left one important thing out. We often forget the most obvious thing. I was waiting for him to mention that when we get people working they pay taxes on their income and the businessman/woman they work for prospers, pays taxes commensurate with this income and enables the business to grow and take on other tax paying employees.

Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and their confederates think it’s a clever mantra to use the phrase “tax breaks for the rich.” If they had their way they’d take all the working capital away from the job providers. I’m a retired construction electrician who made a good living in New York and I never begrudged Donald Trump getting richer with all the construction work he did in New York, providing me and so many other tradesmen with good livings. We didn’t have the capital. We provided the labor. Trump and other people like him provided the capital and thank God they did. They could have simply retired to a life of leisure on some vacation island somewhere. Thanks too that they kept that energy up and still do.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Tax cuts bring economic growth

I don't know what kind of history Senator Dick Durbin is studying.  The Bush tax cuts during the early days of his time in office brought about 54 months of economic growth and five percent unemployment.  It was when the Democrats took over vetoproof control of the economy in January 2007 following the 2006 elections that the economy started to go south.  Would Senator Durbin take all of the investment capital out of the hands of the people who create the jobs?  Four different presidents in the past fifty years stimulated the growth of the economy when taxes encroached to levels that the economy was being choked - Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton (When he adopted Newt's Contract With America Program) and G. W. Bush.   Employment figures began to go up and revenues flowed into the treasury.  As Casey Stengel always used to say, "Ya can look it up."